Complete a peer review by Monday 11/16
This includes responding to their comments & answering at least 1 question (see directions below). 
Submit your comments to Cougar Courses

 I attach 2 articles do them separately 
Directions: 
The goal of your peer review is not to do an edit of all of the minor mistakes (ex. spelling, grammar), but instead to focus on the overall argument of the paper. Is the author making a convincing argument? 
To help you focus your review, please follow the directions below: 

Respond to the comments / questions that the author has commented on in their paper. 
Answer at least 1 of the following (you choose what may be most helpful to the author): 

What position is the writer taking in this paper? What is the writer’s argument?
List the paper’s three most important pieces of evidence or support. Which of these points is most convincing and which is least convincing? Why?
As you think about the paper’s overall argument, has the writer convinced you that it is a logical and reasonable argument? Why or why not?
Restate the thesis in your own words. If you are having trouble identifying a thesis, please explain why.
What are 3 strengths of this paper? What are 3 weak points?

Rubric: 
Completing the peer review is worth 15 points.
To achieve a full score, your review should: 

Provide constructive feedback to the author by:

 Aspect 1
Respond to the comments / questions that the author has commented on in their paper. 
 Aspect 2

Answer at least 1 of the following (you choose what may be most helpful to the author): 

What position is the writer taking in this paper? What is the writer’s argument?
List the paper’s three most important pieces of evidence or support. Which of these points is most convincing and which is least convincing? Why?
As you think about the paper’s overall argument, has the writer convinced you that it is a logical and reasonable argument? Why or why not?
Restate the thesis in your own words. If you are having trouble identifying a thesis, please explain why.
What are 3 strengths of this paper? What are 3 weak points?

ORDER NOW